Saturday, 19 November 2011
MENA Social Media content from one single interface
MENA Social Media content from one single interface
SSHA 2011
The Social Science History Association is an interdisciplinary group of scholars that shares interests in social life and theory; historiography, and historical and social-scientific methodologies. SSHA might be best seen as a coalition of distinctive scholarly communities. Our substantive intellectual work ranges from everyday life in the medieval world – and sometimes earlier -- to contemporary global politics, but we are united in our historicized approach to understanding human events, explaining social processes, and developing innovative theory.One of the special values of SSHA is the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity. It is a principle of the organization that panels should contain papers by scholars from different disciplines (and different institutions). Why is this valuable? For several reasons. First, every discipline develops a degree of myopia when it comes to the definition of problems and methods. And yet the big questions we would like to address historically do not divide neatly along the domains of the disciplines. Politics, family, culture, environment, markets, warfare -- these all correspond to different disciplines. And yet real historical Burma or France unavoidably involves all of them. So bringing the perspectives of specialists in economics, cultural studies, and population history into productive interaction in connection with a question like "Why and how did France become "France?"" is profoundly creative. It leads us to a significantly broader view of the problem, the processes, and the methods that might illuminate.
The term “social science history” has meant different things to different academic generations. In the 1970s, when the SSHA’s first meetings were held, the founding generation of scholars took it to reflect their concern to address pressing questions by combining social-science method and new forms of historical evidence. Quantitative approaches were especially favored by the association’s historical demographers, as well as some of the economic, social and women’s historians of the time. By the 1980s and 1990s, other waves of scholars – including culturally-oriented historians and anthropologists, geographers, political theorists, and comparative-historical social scientists -- had joined the conversation.
New intellectual directions continue to emerge at the outset of the 21st century. Today’s SSHA incorporates a diversity of scholarly styles, with lots of crosstalk among them.
The other distinctive feature of SSHA, going back to its establishment in the 1970s, is the conviction that the social sciences are deeply relevant to historical understanding. Sometimes this conviction has led to a cliometric impulse -- an emphasis on quantitative social history. But it has also been very receptive to qualitative and comparative approaches to historical research as well.
Andrew Abbott describes some of the intellectual and institutional currents that led to this emphasis within and around the history profession and historical sociology in Chaos of Disciplines.
Another great benefit that derives from participating in SSHA is the renewing exposure it permits to brilliant, innovative young scholars in a variety of fields of theory and research. It is so encouraging to see many young scholars whose work goes significantly beyond existing standard approaches. Sometimes PhD students seem excessively beholden to the ideas of their teachers. In the past several years I've been very pleased to see confident innovation and creative thinking by the coming generation of scholars in many of the fields of social and historical research. A good example is a couple of papers on the subject of processes and temporality by Tulia Falleti ("Decentralization in Time: A Process-Tracing Approach to Federal Dynamics of Change") and Matthew Norton ("Processual and Situational Temporalities in Sociological Explanations"). Isaac Reed is another good example of an innovative young scholar who is offering fresh ideas into debates about theory and social science. His recent Interpretation and Social Knowledge, on display at the book exhibit, is a rigorous, fresh approach to post positivist philosophy of social science.
SSHA has been a leader in bringing Geographical Information Systems (GIS) into concrete applications in historical research, and there were a number of panels using this technology with great effectiveness. The Interdisciplinary Consortium for Social and Political Research (ICPSR) is a longstanding partner with SSHA, and there were a number of sessions that illustrated the value of the large databases and advanced historical methods that ICPSR has championed for years. The current president of SSHA, George Alter, is a distinguished historical demographer and also serves as director of ICPSR at the University of Michigan. I'm looking forward to his address later today, "Life Course, Family, and Community." Historical demography is a longstanding area of focus for scholars within the SSHA orbit.
Some new concepts and methods that are visible in this year's program include application of social network analytical tools to historical topics; new thinking about temporality and events; steady progress on large studies of population history; new thinking about colonialism and post-colonialism; and new ideas about comparative economic history across Eurasia. The language of causal mechanisms is showing up much more frequently across panels than I've noticed in previous years.
The Association's journal, Social Science History, reflects many of the strengths of the organization.
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
Who is a mandated reporter in Pennsylvania? Finding out about reporting laws
The news is chock full of reports on long-term abuse of children and the lack of awareness and action taken by witnesses. Maybe I am naive but I thought teachers and coaches... and, morally, witnesses were mandated reporters. I've worked in several states and have taken the licensing
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
Social Media seminar, full house in MENA
- how to capture the voice of the consumer as it happens and make sense out of the overwhelming stream of information
- how to use efficiently a Twitter account to interact with their consumers,
- what type of landing page on a Facebook Fan page will allow users to engage more with their brand.
- the list definitely goes on and on
The web is turning out to be an amazing tool for companies willing to collect significant thoughts and ideas about the brand, new campaigns, products… you name it, the Internet has it all. But in this sea of constant changes, how can a brand wade his way through unstructured raw data, use the blogosphere as the world largest focus group, monitor its e-reputation, participate in the conversation where people like you and me exchange real world information so as to praise, warn, contribute and learn from the community.
- You do not take into consideration the misspellings of your brand name which will allow you to collect a larger spectrum of messages around your brand.
- You are interested in two major markets within the MENA region where an average of 80% of all interactions online are in Arabic, why the query is only in English?
Imagine a funnel-shaped process where the analysis is done only on 20% of the overall content and you make decisions on a small portion of the buzz made by a non representative portion of your online audience. What you need to take from this is that you can integrate valuable lessons learned and best practices from around the globe but you have to localize the usage, keep an open pair of eyes, a kind of one step back approach. Companies that are not in touch with their customers miss out on small but critical ways to make their Social Media efforts more relevant to the region.
Social Media seminar, full house in MENA
- how to capture the voice of the consumer as it happens and make sense out of the overwhelming stream of information
- how to use efficiently a Twitter account to interact with their consumers,
- what type of landing page on a Facebook Fan page will allow users to engage more with their brand.
- the list definitely goes on and on
The web is turning out to be an amazing tool for companies willing to collect significant thoughts and ideas about the brand, new campaigns, products… you name it, the Internet has it all. But in this sea of constant changes, how can a brand wade his way through unstructured raw data, use the blogosphere as the world largest focus group, monitor its e-reputation, participate in the conversation where people like you and me exchange real world information so as to praise, warn, contribute and learn from the community.
- You do not take into consideration the misspellings of your brand name which will allow you to collect a larger spectrum of messages around your brand.
- You are interested in two major markets within the MENA region where an average of 80% of all interactions online are in Arabic, why the query is only in English?
Imagine a funnel-shaped process where the analysis is done only on 20% of the overall content and you make decisions on a small portion of the buzz made by a non representative portion of your online audience. What you need to take from this is that you can integrate valuable lessons learned and best practices from around the globe but you have to localize the usage, keep an open pair of eyes, a kind of one step back approach. Companies that are not in touch with their customers miss out on small but critical ways to make their Social Media efforts more relevant to the region.
Thursday, 3 November 2011
Four years of UnderstandingSociety
Today marks the fourth anniversary of UnderstandingSociety. This is the 613th posting since I began in November 2007 and the 135th in the past year. I continue to find this medium a good way of pushing forward my own learning and thinking about a swirl of topics around the central thrust, making sense of the social realm in which we live. I've been drawn into lines of thought in the past year that I wouldn't have encountered without the intellectual effort involved in writing the blog. And, of course, it is a good way of meeting a reading public all around the world.
Several topics came in for special focus in the past year. First, there is a fair amount of new material on the philosophy of history. Since finishing New Contributions to the Philosophy of History last fall (2010) I've continued to think about history and historiography, and I've found some new issues that I need to think about more fully. There is more to come on this.
Second, I've been thinking about John Rawls's work more in the past year. I first read Rawls as an undergraduate in the late sixties. Then I read A Theory of Justice when it appeared in 1971 as I was beginning to take courses from Rawls as a graduate student. Truthfully, I like the work better today than I did then, 40 years ago. And I'm finding that it provides support for a much deeper critique of our society than I thought then. One part of this rethinking is contained in a piece on "Property-owning democracy". Another is a reflection on Rawls's later thoughts about the deficiencies of an excessively consumerist culture in his correspondence with Philippe van Parijs.
Third, I've written quite a bit in the past twelve months that is directed at issues in analytical sociology. The key premises of the AS approach are very consistent with my own understanding of the social world (microfoundations, methodological localism, causal mechanisms). But the new rash of books and conferences on the issues AS raises have been very stimulating to me, and I'm finding that there are good reasons to support the idea of meso-level social causation. (See the "analytical sociology" thread for these postings.) I expect to do more on this topic in the coming year, including perhaps some more thinking about the issues raised by agent-based modeling.
And finally, there are more posts than in previous years on the issues of inequality and power that are creating more and more difficulty in our country. I think that is a reflection of real changes our society is experiencing: more inequality, more divisive rhetoric, and more racism. The number 1 post (in terms of direct visits) reflected this theme, "Inequalities and the ascendant right." (Interestingly, the number 1 post for subscribers this year was "Rawls on the EU," which represents the more philosophical side of these current issues.)
A fairly general but perhaps unexpected observation is that I've found myself looking back to classics in the social sciences over the past fifty years, and have found new things in these works that didn't catch my attention the first time I read them. This is true, actually, of the rereading I've done of Rawls. But posts on Chalmers Johnson, Herbert Simon, Steven Lukes, and Fritz Stern led me to think more fully about their ideas, and to see new insights that were probably there all along but not for me.
Readers come to the blog through two channels. Slightly more than half the visits to the blog are in the form of direct visits to the Blogger site itself, through searches, referrals, and direct links. And the remainder take the form of readers who use a blog reader or RSS feed to follow or subscribe to the blog. These views don't show up in the first measure. The first "channel" represents a broad population of occasional readers interested in a particular topic. The second represents a group of readers who have deliberately chosen to follow the blog.
The readership of UnderstandingSociety has continued to rise. There were 220,474 visits recorded directly to the site, and another 193,971 views through the RSS feed. About 50% of visits are from the United States, and the other half come from 194 countries and territories. There are about 2,000 readers who follow the blog automatically through an RSS feed, and there are over 1,600 people who follow on Facebook or Twitter. Thanks everyone!
The top ten posts written during this past year were:
Direct visits to the blog:
1 Inequalities and the ascendant right (2,501)
2 The math of social networks (2,451)
3 A jobless future? (2,051)
4 Diagrams and economic thought (1,992)
5 The history of economic thought and the present (1,850)
6 Rawls on political liberalism (1,788)
7 Quiet politics (1,747)
8 Violent rhetoric and violent behavior (1,734)
9 Income inequalities and social ills (1,417)
10 Bourdieu's field (1,414)
Views and clicks through the RSS feed (subscribers):
1 Rawls on the EU (2,313)
2 The math of social networks (2,170)
3 Democracy and contentious politics (2,152)
4 Hume as historian (2,150)
5 Quiet politics (2,076)
6 Herbert Simon's satisficing life (2,075)
7 Possessive individualism (2,074)
8 Education a leveler? (2,057)
9 Income inequalities and social ills (2,050)
10 Hate as a social demographic (2,041)
Interestingly, there are only three overlaps on the two lists – "The math of social networks," "Quiet politics," and "Income inequalities and social ills".
To the right is a link to a bookmarked PDF of the blog through July 2011. There will be an update after the beginning of January. I've spent some time on this part of the project because it gives expression to the "virtual book" part of my goal in the blog. By using the bookmarks organized into threads it is possible for the reader to look at all the postings on a certain general topic at once.
Thanks for reading, following, and sometimes commenting!